Effects of Iron Nanoparticles and Salinity on Growth and Physiology of
Onion (Allium cepa)
Fouzia Hameed1, Shamas Ul Rehman1,
Zainab Naseem2, Atia Nazir3, Saher Nawaz1,4
1Department of Botany, Ghazi
University, Dera Ghazi Khan 32200, Pakistan
2Department of Botany,
University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
3School of Agricultural
Engineering and Food Science, Shandong Research Center of Engineering &
Technology for Clean Energy, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000,
China
4State Key Laboratory of
Grassland Agro-ecosystems and Herbage Improvement, College of Ecology, Lanzhou
University, Lanzhou 730000, China
|
METADATA Paper history Received: 30 July 2026 Revised: 24 September 2026 Accepted: 21 October 2026 Published online: 31 October 2026 Corresponding author Saher Nawaz1 Keywords Photosynthesis Oxidative
stress Malondialdehyde Mineral
nutrients Chlorophyll Antioxidants Citation Hameed F, Rehman SU, Naseem Z, Nazir A, Nawaz S (2026)
Interactive effects of iron nanoparticles and salinity on growth and
physiology of onion (Allium cepa). Innovations in STEAM: Research
& Education 4(2): 26040203. https://doi.org/10.63793/ISRE/0038. |
ABSTRACT Background: Salinity is one of the most significant abiotic stresses affecting
crop production, which affects plant growth, photosynthesis, oxidative
balance and nutrient uptake. The application of nanotechnology, especially
the iron nanoparticles (Fe-NPs) is a promising strategy for enhancing plant
tolerance to saline environments. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the role of
spinach-mediated iron nanoparticles in alleviating salinity-induced damage in
onion (Allium cepa L.) in terms of growth, physiological, biochemical
and mineral responses. Methodology: The pot experiment was carried out in 3 � 4 factorial completely
randomized design (3 replicates) with salinity: 0, 150 and 200 mM NaCl and
Fe-NP foliar application: 0, 250, 350 and 450 ppm. The growth parameters,
photosynthetic pigments, oxidative stress parameters, antioxidant metabolites
and mineral nutrients were measured by standard procedures. Results: The salinity reduced growth, photosynthetic
contents, and nutrient accumulation, and increased the malondialdehyde (MDA)
accumulation that suggests increased oxidative damage. Foliar Fe-NPs improved
growth parameters, increased chlorophyll (a & b) and carotenoids, and
decreased lipid peroxidation, while increasing antioxidant compounds such as
flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and phenolics. Fe-NPs also positively affected
mineral nutrient balance by enhancing the Fe accumulation and minimizing
ionic disturbances due to salinity. The greatest ameliorative action was
observed at 450 ppm. Conclusion: The spinach mediated iron
nanoparticles significantly reduced the physiological and biochemical
constraints of onion under salinity stress by enhancing photosynthetic
pigments, antioxidant defense and nutrient homeostasis. Iron nanoparticles
are a promising approach to enhance onion performance under salinity stress. |
INTRODUCTION
Salinity is one of the major abiotic
stresses affecting agricultural productivity in areas where irrigation and soil
conditions lead to the buildup of soluble salts. Exposure to higher
concentrations of salt for longer periods leads to reduced plant growth,
photosynthesis, metabolic activity, water uptake and ionic balance (Attiq et
al. 2021), eventually causing a reduction in yield of crops (Raphael and
Parthasarathi 2026). Salinity effects are especially evident in the disruption
of the photosynthetic processes. Salt-induced water limitation and ionic
imbalance may cause decreased pigment accumulation and impairment of
photosynthetic machinery (Liu et al. 2019). Thus, chlorophyll (a, b and
total chlorophyll) and carotenoids are good markers to assess plant
physiological response to salinity (Bistgani et al. 2019). Another
consequence of salt exposure is the increased formation of reactive oxygen
species (ROS). When ROS production becomes excessive, cellular membranes and
other macromolecules may be damaged. One outcome is lipid peroxidation and the
associated accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA), which is widely used to
assess membrane injury. Plants also rely on non-enzymatic antioxidants,
including phenolics, flavonoids, and ascorbic acid, to strengthen their
antioxidant protection (Kanwal et al. 2024). Mineral nutrition is also
affected by salinity because the accumulation of Na+ can interfere
with the uptake and distribution of other essential ions, particularly K+.
The ability to maintain ionic balance is therefore important for several
processes, including enzyme activity, osmotic adjustment, stomatal functioning,
and photosynthetic metabolism (Zamir et al. 2026). Consequently,
implementation of efficient strategies to improve nutrient status while
limiting salt-induced ionic disturbances may contribute to greater plant
tolerance.
Onion is an economically
important vegetable crop cultivated extensively in many agricultural systems
(Sekara et al. 2017). Its productivity depends on adequate vegetative
development, efficient nutrient acquisition, and efficient photosynthetic
machinery. However, salinity stress can substantially impair onion growth by
reducing morphological attributes, including shoot and root development, leaf
number, leaf area, and fresh and dry biomass accumulation (Patil et al.
2026). Nanotechnology provides a potential approach for improving plant
resilience to combat various stresses like salinity (Al-Khayri et al.
2023). Iron is an essential micronutrient involved in important metabolic and
photosynthetic processes, and nanoparticle-based Fe delivery may provide an
alternative means of supplying Fe to stressed plants (Sen et al. 2025).
Plant extracts particularly attractive approach to obtain green-synthesized
nanoparticles such as iron, because plant-derived compounds can participate in
nanoparticle formation and may provide an alternative to conventional synthesis
routes (Shahzadi et al. 2025). Although the beneficial effects of
nanoparticles in improving salt tolerance have been reported in several crops,
very limited information is available relevant to the integrated response of
green-synthesized iron nanoparticles under salinity stress in onion plants,
particularly considering growth performance, photosynthetic pigments, oxidative
stress responses, and mineral nutrient balance. We hypothesized that foliar
application of spinach-mediated iron oxide nanoparticles would partially
alleviate salinity-induced damage in onion by improving growth and
photosynthetic pigment accumulation, strengthening antioxidant-related
responses, and improving mineral nutrient balance. Therefore, this study is
directed to investigate the influence of various concentrations of
spinach-mediated iron oxide nanoparticles on growth and physiological
characteristics of onion plants under saline conditions. For this purpose,
influence of nanoparticles under high salt contents on photosynthetic pigments,
oxidative-stress-related attributes, and changes in mineral nutrient
accumulation, particularly K+, Na+, and Fe, is
determined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental site and soil preparation
The experiment was conducted during
2023�2024 in the Department of Botany, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan,
Pakistan. Soil samples were collected from the upper 0�30 cm layer of an
experimental site located in the Department of Botany, Dera Ghazi Khan. The
soil was air-dried for approximately three days, crushed, cleared of stones and
other coarse materials, then passed through a 2 mm sieve for further cleaning.
After that, physicochemical properties were analysed by standard analysis
protocols (Table 1).
Plant material and experimental design
Table 1:
Physicochemical properties of soil Soil characters Value Texture of soil Sandy loam pH 7.8 ECe 4.90 dS
m−1 Saturation
(%) 42 Organic
matter (%) 0.56 Available
phosphorus (mg kg−1) 8.47 Available
potassium (mg kg−1) 151
Synthesis of nanoparticles
By using Abert et al. (2022)
method synthesis of iron-based nanoparticles was done in the laboratory of the
Botany Department at Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan. The iron oxide
nanoparticles were extracted from spinach (Spinacia oleracea). For this
purpose, ferric chloride hexahydrate was mixed with ferrous chloride
tetrahydrate (1:2 molar ratio), then dissolved in 100 mL of water. The mixture
was heated at 80 �C with constant stirring. After 10 min, spinach extract (20
mL) was added. The solution changed color from pale yellow to dark brown,
indicating the formation of nanoparticles. For controlled precipitation of
Fe-nanoparticles, 20 mL of sodium hydroxide was added gradually (3 mL per min).
The mixture was left to cool at ambient temperature. Then decantation was done
to get the nanoparticles. To remove the impurities, thorough rinsing was done
using distilled water. Then dried at room temperature for experimental use.
Data collection and analysis
Plants were uprooted approximately 15
days after Fe-NP treatment for morphological, physiological, and elemental
analysis measurements. For fresh and dried analysis, harvested plants were
stored carefully. For fresh analysis, plants were labeled, placed in zipper
bags, and frozen at −40 �C. For dry analysis, half of harvested plants
were put in brown bags, then oven-dried for 1 week at 65 �C.
Growth parameters
For fresh biomass determination, plants
were uprooted, shoots and roots were separated and weighed immediately on a
top-load weight balance. The plant shoots and roots were put in brown bags,
then, for complete drying, placed in an oven at 65 �C and then weighed on a
top-load weight balance.
Photosynthetic pigments
Arnon (1949) and Davies (1977) methods
were used to determine photosynthetic contents of onion plants by using fresh
leaves. 0.1 g of sample was ground with 5 mL of acetone (80%). The solution was
filtered to take readings at various wavelengths (480, 663, and 645 nm) using a
spectrophotometer. For final calculations, the following formulas were used:
Chl. a (mg/g f. wt.) = [12.7(A663)
− 2.69(A645)] � 5/1000 � 0.1
Chl. b (mg/g f. wt.) = [22.9(A645)
− 4.68(A663)] � 5/1000 � 0.1
Carotenoids (mg/mL) = [(A480)
+ 114(A663) − 0.638(A645)] � V/2500 � W
Oxidative stress and antioxidants
Heath and Packer (1968) method was used
to determine malondialdehyde in plants to measure lipid peroxidation. Fresh
samples of roots and shoots (0.5 g) were ground with 5 mL trichloroacetic acid
(TCA; 5%), centrifuged (15 min), and the supernatant collected. Mixed with TBA
(thiobarbituric acid) and incubated for 25 min (100 �C). Measurements were
taken at 533 and 600 nm.
�������� Flavonoid
concentration was determined separately in leaf and root tissues using the
Zhishen et al. (1999) method with fresh plant extract. For extraction,
methanol (80%) was used. Sodium nitrate and hydroxide were added to the plant
extract with aluminum chloride. The readings were noted at 510 nm using a
spectrophotometer. Final readings were calculated using a standard curve. To
measure the total phenolic content in roots and shoots Julkunen-Tiitto (1985)
Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric assay was used. Fresh root and shoot samples were
ground with acetone (80%). Extracted and mixed with reagent (Folin-Ciocalteu)
and sodium carbonate solution. At 730 nm readings were noted using a
spectrophotometer.
Fresh roots and leaves were used to
determine ascorbic acid content by following the Gillespie and Ainsworth (2007)
method. Samples were ground with metaphosphoric acid (5%) and centrifuged.
Supernatant collected and mixed with 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol. Using a
spectrophotometer, readings were noted at 520 nm.
Elemental analysis
0.5 g of dried plants were digested
with concentrated acid (HNO3). Added distilled water for final
volume of 50 mL. To estimate phosphate-P contents Yoshida et al. (1971)
procedure was used. The digested sample was mixed with HNO3 (2N) and
reagent (molybdate-vanadate). Incubated (20 min), and values were taken at 420
nm. Kowalenko and Lowe (1973) procedure was followed to calculate nitrate-N.
The digested sample was mixed with CTA (chromotropic acid). Values were taken
at 430 nm. Atomic absorption was used to estimate potassium, iron, and sodium
using digested samples.
Statistical analysis
The experimental factorial design was
completely randomized. Salinity and nanoparticle concentrations were recorded
as two factors. For analysis of data, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was
used to evaluate the influence of salinity concentrations on Fe nanoparticle
levels in Statistix 8.1 software. Then Tukey�s test was used for further
analysis, where significance was at P ≤ 0.05. Origin software was used to
represent graphical pictures of results, where values were shown as mean �
standard error (SE).
RESULTS
Growth attributes
ANOVA showed that salinity and
foliar-applied Fe-NP significantly affected onion growth attributes. The
interaction between salinity levels and Fe-NP treatments was significant (P
< 0.05) for shoot and root biomass parameters (Fig. 1). Salinity stress
significantly reduced shoot (fresh and dry) and root (fresh and dry) weights as
compared to control plants. Increasing levels of NaCl (0, 150, and 200 mM)
progressively decreased biomass accumulation, and the lowest values were
recorded under 200 mM NaCl without Fe-NP application. It was observed at 200 mM
NaCl there was more decline in growth compared to 150 mM salinity. However,
exogenous application of Fe-NP significantly enhanced growth traits in normal
and saline conditions. Compared with untreated plants, Fe-NP-treated plants
showed increased shoot and root biomass, with a progressive improvement as
Fe-NP concentration increased. Shoot and root (fresh and dry) weights were
enhanced at 450 ppm Fe-NPs, followed by 350 and 250 ppm Fe-NPs treatment.
Photosynthetic pigments
Statistical analysis
revealed that salinity stress and foliar Fe-NP application significantly
affected photosynthetic pigment contents of onion plants. Salinity
significantly diminished chlorophyll (a, b & total) and carotenoid
contents, whereas Fe-NP application significantly improved pigment accumulation
in non-stress and stress conditions (Fig. 2). The interaction between salinity
and Fe-NP treatments showed significant variation among treatment combinations
(P < 0.05). Results showed that increasing NaCl concentration from 0 to 150
and 200 mM significantly decreased chlorophyll a and b content.
The maximum reduction was observed under 200 mM NaCl without Fe-NP application,
whereas control plants maintained the highest chlorophyll a
concentration. Foliar-applied Fe-NPs significantly improved chlorophyll (a
& b) contents, and maximum enhancement was recorded in 450 ppm
Fe-NPs followed by 350 ppm and 250 ppm treatments under normal and stress
conditions.
�������� High salt contents significantly
reduced the total chlorophyll contents, whereas Fe-NP application progressively
increased chlorophyll accumulation. The highest value of total chlorophyll was
observed under 450 ppm Fe-NPs, followed by 350 ppm and 250 ppm treatments,
demonstrating the protective effect of Fe-NPs on the photosynthetic apparatus
under salt stress. Carotenoid contents also showed significant variation among
salinity � Fe-NP combinations. Increasing NaCl concentration reduced carotenoid
accumulation, while Fe-NP application significantly improved carotenoid content
under stress conditions.
Oxidative stress and
antioxidant responses
Salinity and foliar
Fe-NP application significantly influenced oxidative stress and antioxidant
metabolites in onion (Fig. 3a, 3b). Their interaction was also significant (P
< 0.05), as reflected by the different Tukey grouping letters among
treatment combinations.
MDA
accumulation increased significantly in both leaf and root tissues under
salinity and reached its highest level at 200 mM NaCl, indicating greater lipid
peroxidation. Foliar Fe-NP application lowered MDA relative to untreated
salt-stressed plants. In contrast, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and total
phenolics generally increased following Fe-NP application. The highest
antioxidant accumulation occurred at 450 ppm Fe-NPs, followed by 350 and 250
ppm. Thus, Fe-NP treatment was associated with lower oxidative damage and
stronger antioxidant responses under saline conditions (Fig. 3a, 3b).
Elemental
composition
Statistics revealed
that salinity and foliar-applied Fe-NP significantly affected mineral nutrient
accumulation in onion plants (Fig. 4a, 4b, 4c). The salinity � Fe-NP
interaction was significant (P < 0.05) for all analysed elements except leaf
potassium, which showed a non-significant interaction (P > 0.05). Increasing
NaCl concentration disturbed mineral balance by decreasing essential nutrient
accumulation and increasing sodium levels, particularly under 200 mM NaCl
stress. Foliar Fe-NP application significantly improved nutrient status under
saline conditions by enhancing iron accumulation, improving potassium
retention, and reducing excessive sodium accumulation. Iron concentration in
leaf and root tissues increased progressively with increasing Fe-NP levels,
with the maximum accumulation recorded under 450 ppm Fe-NPs, followed by 350
and 250 ppm treatments. Similarly, Fe-NP application improved nitrate and
phosphate accumulation under salt stress. Overall, Fe-NPs enhanced nutrient
acquisition and helped to maintain ionic homeostasis under saline conditions.
Correlation matrix
Pearson correlation
of treatment means showed tight coupling among most traits (Fig. 8). Growth
traits (shoot and root fresh and dry weight) were strongly positively
correlated with chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids,
nitrate, phosphate, potassium, iron and phenolics (r = 0.84 to 0.99, P <
0.001). The same growth traits were strongly negatively correlated with leaf
and root MDA (r ≈ −0.95 to −0.98, P < 0.001) and with leaf
and root sodium (r ≈ −0.95 to −0.96, P < 0.001). Sodium
itself was strongly positively correlated with MDA (r ≈ 0.96 to 0.97, P
< 0.001). Nitrate, phosphate and potassium were strongly positively
correlated with one another (r ≥ 0.99) and negatively correlated with
sodium (r ≈ −0.83 to −0.89, P < 0.001). Flavonoids and
ascorbic acid were only weakly or moderately correlated with the other traits
(|r| ≤ 0.57), so they did not track the growth and nutrient response
(Fig. 5).
DISCUSSION
Salinity affects
crop productivity by causing osmotic imbalance, ionic toxicity, oxidative
damage and disrupting normal physiological processes. The onion growth such as
shoot and root biomass decreased with the increase of NaCl concentration in this study. Salinity-induced growth
Fig.
1: Foliar application of
spinach-mediated iron nanoparticles (Fe NPs) improves growth of onion
plants under salinity stress. a, Shoot fresh weight. b, Shoot dry weight.
c, Root fresh weight. d, Root dry weight. Plants were grown under 0, 150 or
200 mM NaCl and sprayed with Fe NPs at 0, 250, 350 or 450 ppm. Data are
mean � SE. Different letters indicate significant differences among
treatments (P ≤ 0.05). Fig.
2: Spinach-mediated iron nanoparticles
(Fe NPs) restore photosynthetic pigments in onion plants under salinity
stress. a, Chlorophyll a. b, Carotenoids. c, Chlorophyll b. d, Total
chlorophyll content. Plants were grown under 0, 150 or 200 mM NaCl and
sprayed with Fe NPs at 0, 250, 350 or 450 ppm. Pigment contents are
expressed as mg g⁻� fresh weight (FW). Data are mean � SE. Different
letters indicate significant differences among treatments (P ≤ 0.05). Fig.
3a: Foliar application of spinach-mediated
iron nanoparticles (Fe NPs) improves growth of onion plants under salinity
stress. a, Shoot fresh weight. b, Shoot dry weight. c, Root fresh weight.
d, Root dry weight. Plants were grown under 0, 150 or 200 mM NaCl and
sprayed with Fe NPs at 0, 250, 350 or 450 ppm. Data are mean � SE.
Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (P
≤ 0.05). Fig.
3b: Spinach-mediated iron nanoparticles
(Fe NPs) enhance non-enzymatic antioxidants in onion plants under salinity
stress. a, Leaf ascorbic acid. b, Leaf total phenolics. c, Root ascorbic
acid. d, Root total phenolics. Plants were grown under 0, 150 or 200 mM
NaCl and sprayed with Fe NPs at 0, 250, 350 or 450 ppm. Contents are
expressed as mg g⁻� fresh weight (f.w.). Data are mean � SE.
Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (P
≤ 0.05). Fig.
4a: Spinach-mediated iron nanoparticles
(Fe NPs) improve nitrate and phosphate accumulation in onion plants under
salinity stress. a, Leaf nitrate. b, Leaf phosphate. c, Root nitrate. d,
Root phosphate. Plants were grown under 0, 150 or 200 mM NaCl and sprayed
with Fe NPs at 0, 250, 350 or 450 ppm. Contents are expressed as a
percentage (%). Data are mean � SE. Different letters indicate significant
differences among treatments (P ≤ 0.05). Fig.
4b: Spinach-mediated iron nanoparticles
(Fe NPs) increase potassium and reduce sodium accumulation in onion plants
under salinity stress. a, Leaf potassium. b, Leaf sodium. c, Root
potassium. d, Root sodium. Plants were grown under 0, 150 or 200 mM NaCl
and sprayed with Fe NPs at 0, 250, 350 or 450 ppm. Contents are expressed
as a percentage (%). Data are mean � SE. Different letters indicate
significant differences among treatments according to Tukey�s test (P
≤ 0.05). Fig. 4c:
Spinach-mediated iron nanoparticles (Fe NPs) increase iron accumulation in
onion plants under salinity stress. a, Leaf iron. b, Root iron. Plants were
grown under 0, 150 or 200 mM NaCl and sprayed with Fe NPs at 0, 250, 350 or
450 ppm. Iron content is expressed as a percentage (%). Data are mean � SE.
Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments
according to Tukey�s test (P ≤ 0.05).
inhibition can be due to cell growth limitation, reduction in water
availability, decreased uptake of nutrients, and the build-up of Na+
ions (Balasubramaniam et al. 2023). Ion balance of cells is also
affected by high salt concentrations, and this disturbs metabolic activity
leading to a decreased biomass production (Gul et al. 2022). Results
indicated that the activity of growth inhibition increased with NaCl
concentration, being more pronounced at 200 mM than at 150 mM. Foliar-applied
spinach-mediated Fe-NPs significantly improved root and shoot biomass under
high salt contents, demonstrating their protective role against salt-induced
growth inhibition. Iron is considered an essential nutrient because of its
involvement in chlorophyll
�������� The reductions in chlorophyll a,
chlorophyll b, and carotenoids under high salinity indicate disturbance
of the photosynthetic system. Under salt stress, chlorophyll level can be
reduced due to limitation in its biosynthesis, increased degradation and
oxidative damage to chloroplast membranes (Li et al. 2015). Carotenoids
also play a role in photoprotection, through their ability to dissipate excess
excitation energy and to scavenge ROS. They could then be expected to display
less photoprotection under conditions of high salinity (Ramachandran et al.
2023).
�������� Fe-NP application resulted in an
increase in photosynthetic pigments, indicating the alleviating effect of Fe
supply on the protection of pigment-related processes under salt stress. Iron
is associated with chlorophyll biosynthesis and electron transfer via
iron-containing proteins such as ferredoxin and cytochromes. Similarly, Fe-NPs
were seen to enhance PSII activity and photosynthetic performance and pigment
stability under saline conditions. The carotenoids increased following the
treatment with Fe-NP, which is also consistent with enhanced protection from
photo-oxidative damage and oxidative injury. Kreslavski et al. (2023)
similarly reported that Fe3O4 nanoparticles improved
photosynthesis, PSII activity, and pigment stability under saline conditions.
The increase in carotenoids observed after Fe-NP treatment is also consistent
with improved photoprotection and lower oxidative injury.
�������� The rise in malondialdehyde (MDA) in
onion leaves and roots showed that salinity increased oxidative stress in the
present study. Higher MDA is associated with lipid peroxidation and membrane
injury resulting from excessive ROS production (Nawaz et al. 2025).
Under saline conditions, disruption of electron transport and other metabolic
processes can increase ROS formation, thereby affecting membrane stability and
cellular function (Hameed et al. 2021).
�������� The decline in MDA after Fe-NP
application indicates that oxidative injury was reduced. Iron participates in
antioxidant metabolism, including as a cofactor in several antioxidant enzymes,
and Fe-NPs may influence ROS-scavenging and cellular redox regulation (Kej�k et
al. 2021). In the present study, Fe-NP application also increased
flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and phenolic compounds, showing a stronger
non-enzymatic antioxidant response. Phenolics and flavonoids can directly
scavenge ROS, while ascorbic acid contributes to regulation of the cellular
redox Fig.
5: Correlation among growth, pigment,
antioxidant and nutrient traits of onion plants under salinity stress and
Fe NP treatment. Pearson correlation matrix of 23 traits calculated from
treatment means (3 NaCl levels � 4 Fe NP concentrations; n = 12). Lower triangle:
circle size and color show the correlation coefficient (r), with red for
positive and blue for negative correlation. Upper triangle: r values with
significance (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). Trait groups
are color-coded: growth (teal), pigments (green), oxidative stress and
antioxidants (orange), and nutrients and ions (purple). MDA,
malondialdehyde; AsA, ascorbic acid; Chl, chlorophyll; FW, fresh weight;
DW, dry weight.
�������� Salinity also altered mineral nutrient
composition, including nitrate, phosphate, potassium, sodium, and iron (Nawaz et
al. 2022). Excessive Na+ accumulation is a major component of
salt toxicity because it competes with essential nutrients and disrupts ionic
balance. K+ is particularly important for salt tolerance because it
regulates osmotic adjustment, enzyme activation, stomatal movement, and
cellular metabolism. In the present study, salinity reduced K+
accumulation, while Fe-NP application improved nutrient balance under stress
conditions. However, the salinity � Fe-NP interaction for leaf K+
was non-significant, suggesting that Fe-NP application did not significantly
modify the effect of salinity on leaf K+ accumulation. The significant increase in Fe accumulation following
Fe-NP application confirms effective uptake and utilization of foliar-applied
nanoparticles. Improved stress tolerance may be mediated by enhanced Fe
availability, which may lead to increased activity of antioxidant enzymes,
electron transport and formation of chlorophyll (Kreslavski et al.
2023). Likewise, better accumulation of nitrate and phosphate following Fe-NP
application is indicative of better nutrient uptake and utilization under
saline conditions. An improvement in nutrient uptake and ion homeostasis with
nanoparticles use has been reported as an important mechanism of salinity
tolerance (Jamei et al. 2026). The decrease in Na+ after
Fe-NP application suggests that the plants in salinity are better controlled by
the flow of Na+. Saline condition requires proper balance of Na+
and K+ intake for proper growth of plant: sodium high concentration
causes disturbance in metabolic activities and causes damages in the cellular
structure. Recent research shows that iron-based nanoparticles can control ion
homeostasis, improve the efficacy of nutrient assimilation, and improve
antioxidant defense systems in salinity (Alsamadany et al. 2024).
Overall, it was found that use of Fe-NPs in the presence of excessive salt load
significantly reduced the physico-biochemical disturbances in the onion plants.
Multiple mechanisms were responsible for the positive effect of Fe-NPs such as
improved biomass production, preservation of photosynthetic pigments,
suppression of oxidative damage, increase of antioxidant metabolites, and
regulation of balance of mineral nutrients. Of the applied treatment, 450 ppm
Fe-NPs exhibited the highest ameliorative effect, suggesting that optimal
application of Fe-NPs could be a favorable approach for enhancing the onion
performance in saline environment (Fig. 5).
CONCLUSION
The growth,
photosynthetic pigments, antioxidants, and mineral nutrient balance of onion
plants were significantly reduced by salinity. The results show that foliar
application of Fe-NPs also has a positive effect on alleviating the damage
caused by salt stress by enhancing biomass production, maintaining
photosynthetic pigments, reducing oxidative stress, and enhancing antioxidant
metabolites. Fe-NPs also has the ability to regulate nutrient homeostasis by
increasing Fe availability and controlling ionic balance under saline
conditions. All treatments exhibited ameliorative activity with the 450 ppm
Fe-NPs exhibiting the highest, followed by 350 and 250 ppm treatments. Overall,
foliar Fe-NP application is a promising approach to enhance salinity stress tolerance
in onion.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors
acknowledge the Department of Botany, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan,
Pakistan for providing laboratory facilities.
AUTHOR
CONTRIBUTIONS
FH, SUR and SN
conceived and designed the study; FH, SUR, ZN and AN performed the experiments
and analyzed the data; FH wrote the first draft. SN supervised the work and
administered the project; all authors reviewed, edited and approved the final
manuscript.
CONFLICT
OF INTEREST
The authors declare
no conflict of interest.
DATA
AVAILABILITY
The data will be
made available on a fair request to the corresponding author.
ETHICS
APPROVAL
Not applicable.
FUNDING
SOURCE
The study did not
receive any financial support.
REFERENCES
Abert HO, Aduwamai HU, Adamu SS (2022) Effect of green
synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles using spinach extract on Triton
X-100-induced atherosclerosis in rats. Biochemistry Research International
2022(1): 9311227. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9311227.
Al-Khayri JM, Rashmi R, Surya Ulhas R, Sudheer WN,
Banadka A, Nagella P, Aldaej MI, Rezk AAS, Shehata WF, Almaghasla MI (2023) The
role of nanoparticles in response of plants to abiotic stress at physiological,
biochemical, and molecular levels. Plants 12(2): 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020292.
Alsamadany H, Anayatullah S, Zia-ur-Rehman M, Usman M, Ameen T, Alharby HF, Alharbi BM, Abdulmajeed AM, Yong JWH,
Rizwan M (2024) Residual efficiency of
iron-nanoparticles and different iron sources on growth and antioxidants in
maize plants under salt stress: life cycle study. Heliyon 10(7): e28973.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28973.
Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts.
Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24(1): 1�15.
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1.
Attiq W, Tayyab Q, Ali Q (2021) Salinity stress in
crops: mechanisms and mitigation techniques using PGPR and silicon. Plant
and Environment 2(1): 36�54. https://doi.org/10.54219/plantenviron.2021.9254.
Balasubramaniam T, Shen G, Esmaeili N, Zhang H (2023)
Plants� response mechanisms to salinity stress. Plants 12(12): 2253. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122253.
Bistgani ZE, Hashemi M, DaCosta M, Craker L, Maggi F,
Morshedloo MR (2019) Effect of salinity stress on the physiological
characteristics, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of Thymus
vulgaris L. and Thymus daenensis Celak. Industrial Crops and
Products 135: 311�320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.055.
Davies B (1977) Carotenoids in higher plants. In: Lipids
and Lipid Polymers in Higher Plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp
199�217.
Gillespie KM, Ainsworth EA (2007) Measurement of
reduced, oxidized and total ascorbate content in plants. Nature Protocols
2(4): 871�874. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.101.
Gul Z, Tang ZH, Arif M, Ye Z (2022) An insight into
abiotic stress and influx tolerance mechanisms in plants to cope in saline
environments. Biology 11(4): 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11040597
Hameed A, Ahmed MZ, Hussain T, Aziz I, Ahmad N, Gul B,
Nielsen BL (2021) Effects of salinity stress on chloroplast structure and
function. Cells 10(8): 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10082023.
Heath RL, Packer L (1968) Photoperoxidation in isolated
chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Archives
of Biochemistry and Biophysics 125(1): 189�198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1.
Hou D, Cui X, Liu M, Qie H, Tang Y, Xu R, Zhao P, Leng
W, Luo N, Luo H, Lin A, Wei W, Yang W, Zheng T (2024) The effects of iron-based
nanomaterials (Fe NMs) on plants under stressful environments: machine
learning-assisted meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management
354: 120406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120406.
Jamei R, Onsori O, Jamei M (2026) Nanoparticles and
salinity stress: emerging insights into plant responses and stress mitigation. Plant
Stress 20(3): 101265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2026.101265.
Julkunen-Tiitto R (1985) Phenolic constituents in the
leaves of northern willows: methods for the analysis of certain phenolics. Journal
of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 33: 213�217. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00062a013/
Kanwal R, Maqsood MF, Shahbaz M, Naz N, Zulfiqar U, Ali
MF, Jamil M, Khalid F, Ali Q, Sabir MA, Chaudhary T (2024) Exogenous ascorbic
acid as a potent regulator of antioxidants, osmo-protectants, and lipid
peroxidation in pea under salt stress. BMC Plant Biology 24(1): 247. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04947-3.
Kej�k Z, Kapl�nek R, Masař�k M, Babula P, Matkowski
A, Filipensk� P, Vesel� K, Gburek J, S�kora D, Mart�sek P, Jakubek M (2021)
Iron complexes of flavonoids-antioxidant capacity and beyond. International
Journal of Molecular Sciences 22(2): 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020646.
Kowalenko CG, Lowe LE (1973) Determination of nitrates
in soil extracts. Soil Science Society of America Journal 37(4): 660. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1973.03615995003700040051x.
Kreslavski VD, Shmarev AN, Ivanov AA, Zharmukhamedov SK,
Strokina V, Kosobryukhov A, Yu M, Allakhverdiev SI, Shabala S (2023) Effects of
iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4) and salinity on growth,
photosynthesis, antioxidant activity and distribution of mineral elements in
wheat (Triticum aestivum). Functional Plant Biology 50(11):
932�940. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP23085.
Li J, Hu L, Zhang L, Pan X, Hu X (2015) Exogenous
spermidine is enhancing tomato tolerance to salinity�alkalinity stress by
regulating chloroplast antioxidant system and chlorophyll metabolism. BMC
Plant Biology 15(1): 303. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0699-7.
Liu B, Soundararajan P, Manivannan A (2019) Mechanisms
of silicon-mediated amelioration of salt stress in plants. Plants 8(9):
307. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8090307.
Nawaz S, Ahmad MSA, Nazir A, Nijabat A, Leghari SK,
Gulshan AB, Hussain F, Khan MA, Awan AN, Naseem Z (2022) Gamma irradiation a
potent mitigant of saline stress in maize crop. GU Journal of Phytosciences
2: 9�16.
Nawaz S, Wahid A, Shahbaz M, Basra SM (2025) Evaluation
of heat stress induced plant metabolites in Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.
by exogenous application of plant growth promoters. Energy & Environment
36(3): 1105�1131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231192355.
Patil MB, Patil SS, Mahadule PA, Pawar AR, Gade KA,
Arunachalam T (2026) Soil salinity impairs soil microbial activity, nutrient
availability, plant nutrient uptake, and yield of onion (Allium cepa
L.). Frontiers in Plant Science 17: 1860923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1860923.
Rai S, Singh PK, Mankotia S, Swain J, Satbhai SB (2021)
Iron homeostasis in plants and its crosstalk with copper, zinc, and manganese. Plant
Stress 1: 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2021.100008
Ramachandran P, Pandey NK, Yadav RM, Suresh P, Kumar A,
Subramanyam R (2023) Photosynthetic efficiency and transcriptome analysis of Dunaliella
salina under hypersaline: a retrograde signaling mechanism in the
chloroplast. Frontiers in Plant Science 14: 1192258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1192258.
Raphael D, Parthasarathi T (2026) Halophilic plant
growth-promoting bacterial consortium reshapes soil microbiota to enhance
salinity tolerance, antioxidant defense, and yield in Vigna mungo L. Frontiers
in Microbiology 17: 1878014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1878014.
Sekara A, Pokluda R, Del Vacchio L, Somma S, Caruso G
(2017) Interactions among genotype, environment and agronomic practices on
production and quality of storage onion (Allium cepa L.) � a review. Horticultural
Science 44(1): 21�42. https://doi.org/10.17221/92/2015-HORTSC.
Sen B, Roy D, Narayan M, Sarma H (2025)
Nanoparticle-driven stress alleviation: exploring the roles of metal and metal
oxide nanoparticles in plant abiotic stress management. Discover Plants
2(1): 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-025-00153-z.
Shahzadi S, Fatima S, ul ain Q, Shafiq Z, Janjua MRSA
(2025) A review on green synthesis of silver nanoparticles (SNPs) using plant
extracts: a multifaceted approach in photocatalysis, environmental remediation,
and biomedicine. RSC Advances 15(5): 3858�3903. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA07519F.
Singh A, Bol R, Lovynska V, Singh RK, Sousa JR,
Ghazaryan K (2025) Application of nanoparticles for salinity stress management
and biofortification in wheat: a review of dual approaches and insights. Frontiers
in Plant Science 16: 1592866. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1592866.
Tan U, G�ren HK, Canavar � (2026) Meta-analysis of
nanoparticles in plant drought responses: functional shifts across stress
intensities and nanoparticle types. Physiologia Plantarum 178(1):
e70701. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70701.
Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH (1971) Laboratory Manual
for Physiological Studies of Rice. Los Ba�os: International Rice Research
Institute, p 61.
Zamir H, Shah DA, Rauf F, Ahmad H, Khan S, Zulfiqar U,
Alotaibi MS, Ergasheva O, Sotiboldiyeva D, Gururani MA, Korai SK (2026)
Salinity signaling networks in wheat: crosstalk among Ca2+, ROS,
phytohormones, and metabolic signals in salt adaptation. Plant Signaling
& Behavior 21(1): 2700909. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2026.2700909.
Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W (1999) The
determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on
superoxide radicals. Food Chemistry 64: 555�559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2.
Zia-ur-Rehman M, Mfarrej MFB, Usman M, Anayatullah S,
Rizwan M, Alharby HF, Zeid IMA, Alabdallah NM, Ali S (2023) Effect of iron
nanoparticles and conventional sources of Fe on growth, physiology and nutrient
accumulation in wheat plants grown on normal and salt-affected soils. Journal
of Hazardous Materials 458: 131861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131861.